The next step forward in computerised Business Systems will be

Business Process Automation
and Workflow Management


As was demonstrated in the page dealing with automated interoperation, a major way in which computers can be applied to more effective business methods is to allow them to automatically carry out the routine tasks involved in running the day to day operation of the organisation. This will free human effort for more creative tasks which can achieve smoother running and develop that all-important competitive edge.

It should be noted, that while increased market share and sales is one way in which a competitive edge can be achieved, the benefit is not linear. i.e. one dollr in additonal sales usually achieves considerably less than one dollar in extra profit, depending on the cost of ataining that increase in sales and the cost of the sale itself.

However, each dollar saved in the costs of operating the business reflects directly as one more dollar in profit on the bottom line of the Operating statement (Profit/Loss report). Thus benefits resulting from business process improvements and reduction of operating costs are a very effective means of developing a competitive edge.

The ICARIS project is studying the business benefits of business process automation, the problems associated with its implementation and control and the practical methods by which it can be achieved. Here is a brief introduction to our thinking.

Consequences of Improved Process Interoperation

Efficient interoperation technology such as BSI is now available, whose implementation and operating costs place automated interoperation well within the reach of organisations of all sizes. This now opens the way for many significant improvements in the application of computers to carrying out the routine business processes fully automatically:

Workflow Management

Should the operator of a particular business process be absent, transactions for that process might remain unprocessed during that period of absence. Similarly, processing delays could occur when the workload exceeds the capacity of the operators allocated to a particular process. Delays in processing trasnactions, no matter what the reason, reduce the effectiveness of an organisations and this in turn can lead to customer dissatisfaction. At this point the situation becomes serious.

With the business processes automated as described above, staff absences can have a much less immediate effect because the computerised business processes continue to operate automatically without human intervention. However, if problems requiring human intervention continue to remain unsolved, e.g. because of absences or overload, then the same consequences could result, even though the timing may not be as crucial as in the unautomated scenario.

So, is it possible that the staff allocation to the various computerised processes could be held on the business database and the process automatically direct a problem to a specific person or a specific group of people?

Is it possible another business process could monitor the progress of the solution to those problems and if any remain unsolved after a specified time period, advise the supervisor of the delay for action?

Is it possible to go one step further and that business process redirect the problem to another member of staff, perhaps even a person assigned to a different process, but noted as capable of handling the one involved?

These questions are leading to a determination of the feasibility of actually automating the workflow management processes including staff allocation. Perhaps even preparing staffing schedules and advising department managers on overall optimised staffing requirements for overseeing the computerised automatic business processes.


Created 30 November 2000      Modified 02 January 2001
HOME      Webmaster